Blog

  • Build Log — May 2026: Landing Gear, Gull-Wing Doors, and Fuselage Infusion

    Build log · May 2026 · From the workshop in Ballószög and the desk in Addison.

    May was the month the airplane stopped being a collection of individual parts and started becoming an integrated machine. Landing gear went into the wing. Doors got their final kinematic solution. The fuel system grew a brain. And the fuselage started its journey from two empty shells to a single, bonded airframe.

    Main landing gear — installed and perfect

    The main gear legs went into the wing for the first time this month. Every pin aligned, every axis within a tenth of a millimeter, no trimming needed. The fit was so clean that Andre called it the best day of the build so far. The anodized 7075-T6 aluminum scissor hardware, hinge brackets, and bellcranks all bolted in without shimming — a direct result of the CNC-drilled jigs we spent weeks building in April.

    We’re testing the gear at 1.875 times the calculated limit load, which itself is based on a 3.8 g vertical impact — a number that’s realistically impossible to hit in normal flying but not at all impossible in a flight school. Total gear deflection is close to ten inches, so even a hard landing barely transfers energy into the airframe. The gas strut dampening is adjustable in both directions, which means we can tune the ride feel differently for the trainer variant versus the touring configuration.

    Gull-wing doors — solved

    After three months of losing sleep over the door geometry, Andre cracked it. The solution: move the hinge to the top of the cabin frame and use two gas-hydraulic cylinders per side. The gas springs help with manual opening; compact hydraulic cylinders handle powered open, close, and lock — all driven by a single servo actuator per door.

    Each door panel weighs 2 kg. Seven locking points per door. When the door swings open, the lock mechanisms retract into the frame automatically — nobody catches a hand on exposed hardware. The top of the door clears 2.05 meters, so you step in without ducking. And the whole system uses 800-gram brushless hydraulic pumps borrowed from VW automatic transmission technology. They run forever.

    Electric retractable steps

    The steps deploy automatically when you open the door and retract when you close it. Six seconds per side, independent left and right. The whole entry sequence works off a phone or key fob — press the button, the steps come out, the doors unlock and swing open, the cabin lights come on. It feels more like a Tesla Model X than a Cessna.

    Automatic fuel management

    The fuel selector panel is now a fully integrated module — mechanical valves, contactless hall-sensor position detection, background LEDs, status indicators, and communication electronics, all behind a single connector. In manual mode, the selectors work purely mechanically — flip the switch, the valve opens. No electricity required. In auto mode, the system switches tanks on a timed interval and shows you which tank is active on the Garmin display. You physically cannot start the engine with the fuel valves closed.

    Next step: auto-balance mode, where the system keeps both tanks at the same level within a few liters. The hardware is already capable — it’s just software now.

    Starlink integrated

    The Starlink antenna fits under the windshield behind dark plexiglass panels. Completely invisible from the cockpit. Plenty of room — there’s more space under the dash than we expected. Available across the lineup.

    BRS Kevlar belt channel — tested and working

    The custom channel that routes the BRS parachute’s Kevlar bridle through the fuselage is done and tested. You pull a rubber seal, slide the belt out, and slide a new one in. Two to three kilograms of pull force. Five to ten minutes of labor for what is, on a Cirrus, a $30,000 job that involves cutting the fuselage open. We designed the airframe around easy BRS replacement from the very first sketch.

    Fuselage — resin infusion underway

    The fuselage shells are going through resin infusion instead of traditional prepreg layup. One hour of injection time. The adhesive bed tools for joining the upper and lower shells are complete — these aren’t strictly needed for the prototype, but they’re mandatory for repeatable production quality, so we built them now. The structural adhesive bonding technique for the two fuselage halves is proven and ready.

    Interior materials locked in

    Silicone-molded cup holders, door pockets, and console inserts — all mounted in a carbon-fiber frame. Coffee-resistant. Wine-resistant. Available in any color. The supplier carries a 15-year warranty on the material. We’re defining three standard interior color packages, with full custom available for anyone willing to pay for it.

    SS304 exhaust partnership

    We’ve connected with an exhaust manufacturer that has CNC tube bending and laser welding. They’re excited to work with us. Stainless steel 304 — the consensus pick from several racing exhaust specialists we consulted. Better than titanium for our heat-cycle profile (titanium cracks under thermal shock), easy to weld, and thin-wall construction keeps the weight down. Two-week manufacturing time.

    Production tooling complete

    Every jig we need for serial production is now on the shelf: flap jigs, aileron jigs, rudder, vertical stab, horizontal stab, elevator, landing gear installation jigs. Iron drill jigs with heat-treated guides. The wing jigs are protectively stored. All the tail section molds are done. We are no longer building a prototype — we’re building the first production aircraft using production tooling.

    What’s next

    June: fuselage shells get joined. Side windows go in. Door electronics get finalized. The team from Texas visits the workshop in Hungary for the first time. And we keep pushing forward.

  • Build Log — April 2026: Wings, Tanks, Doors, and Electronics

    Build Log — April 2026: Wings, Tanks, Doors, and Electronics

    From the Hungary workshop, Patrick and Sándor Kordassanyi — Volozen engineering lead.

    April was the month the airplane stopped looking like CAD and started looking like an aircraft.

    Wing complete

    The complete wing is on its jigs at 115 kilograms — flaps, ailerons, robust landing-gear support and all. That’s about 10 kg heavier than the Racer 540 wing we benchmarked it against, but the 4xx wing is significantly larger and considerably stronger. Lower wing skin came in at 25 kg. The upper skin is intentionally heavier — reinforced for foot traffic, because real pilots actually walk on the wing root.

    Fuselage skin

    Fuel tanks pass 2× FAR23

    The new 60-liter hybrid composite fuel tank weighs 3.8 kg, fits 16 US gallons, and was hydro-tested to twice the burst pressure required by FAR Part 23. No welds, no rivets, no fatigue path. Three internal baffles. Joined by adhesive only. One of the lightest tanks in the category, and replaceable in pairs or sets — we can configure two, four, or six tanks depending on the variant, for a total fuel capacity from 200 L (trainer variant / 436T) up to 300 L on the touring variant.

    Doors out of mold

    After two months of trade-study work on gull-wing geometry, we made the call to switch to conventional door hinges — 60-degree opening, robust gas-strut and actuator routing through the side panel. Lighter, simpler, more reliable, and better headroom on entry. Reliability and availability beat sexy. The doors come out of the mold needing almost no trim.

    Door panel out of mold

    Custom electronics on the bench

    All of our wing electronics, dimmer modules, fuel-valve controllers, and dual-flash strobes are now in PCB form and being bench-tested. Every connector is keyed differently — idiot-proof, by design. IP65 rated. The LED nav, taxi, landing, wig-wag, and strobe systems are all our own.

    In-house electronics

    Yoke system: kevlar belt drive, zero backlash

    The control yoke is a fully linear-motion design with a Kevlar belt drive — no chains, no maintenance, double the tensile strength of chain, no noise. A carbon bridge between left and right yokes eliminates backlash. Big win for flight schools — beginners feel a yoke that works the same on both sides.

    Next up

    Main landing gear drop-test machine builds out next week. We’ll be testing limit and ultimate drops on nose and main gear, plus a 20,000-cycle fatigue regimen and 100,000-cycle gas-strut lifetime test. A 32-channel data recorder will log every test. None of this is required for the experimental airworthiness we’re starting with — it’s required for the FAR Part 23 path we’re committed to.

    More soon.

  • BRS — The Magic Container

    BRS — The Magic Container

    Build log · Late April 2026.

    Today the BRS container came out of mold. We’ve been calling it the “magic container” for months because it has to do five jobs in one composite layup, all to flight-test tolerances, with zero metal fasteners.

    BRS chute container assembly

    What the container has to hold

    • The folded ballistic parachute itself
    • The rocket motor that fires the chute
    • The Kevlar bridle that connects the chute to the airframe
    • The rear-structural support attach points (it’s part of the airframe’s longitudinal stability)
    • The harness fittings for the rear seat belts

    Why it matters that it’s one part

    BRS retrofits in legacy GA aircraft are bolt-on add-ons — pulled from a stock catalog and integrated wherever the airframe will accept them. Volozen’s container is the inverse. The airframe was designed around the BRS from sketch one. The container does five structural jobs because it gets to be in the right place. It’s lighter than a bolt-on retrofit. It’s stiffer. And the rocket-motor fire path is engineered into the bay rather than added after-the-fact.

    Andre’s been chasing this part for over a year. Today it’s reality.

  • Why Two Families, Not One

    Why Two Families, Not One

    From Patrick — Volozen, Texas.

    The question we get most often from pilots and flight school operators is some version of: “Why not just build one airplane?”

    Fair question. Here’s the answer.

    A trainer and a touring airplane aren’t the same product

    A two-seat trainer optimizes for hourly utilization, student abuse tolerance, and decade-long reliability. A four-seat tourer optimizes for cabin comfort, systems integration, and cross-country capability. These are fundamentally different missions — and pretending one airframe can serve both is how legacy designs end up as expensive compromises that satisfy nobody completely.

    Volozen aircraft

    The platform answer

    Instead of one airplane trying to do everything, Volozen builds two families on a single composite platform:

    • The 4xx family — four-seat aircraft. The 458 is the flagship with full systems integration. The 436 is the streamlined variant built for flight school fleets.
    • The 2xx family — two-seat aircraft. Training and aerobatic variants. Stick or yoke, depending on the mission.

    Same wing. Same fuselage construction. Same landing gear. Same fuel tanks. Same doors. Same electronics modules. Different seat count, different configuration — same engineering underneath.

    Why the parts pool matters

    For a flight school: one mechanic skillset, one spares inventory, one set of maintenance procedures — whether you’re running two-seat trainers, four-seat advanced trainers, or a mix. For an owner: parts available wherever there are Volozen aircraft in service, including the training fleets. For us: tooling cost amortized across the full family, certification effort built around a single airframe architecture rather than multiple parallel programs.

    Composite fabric layup

    Different airplanes for different missions

    That’s why two families, not one airplane. Not because we’re indecisive — because we know who we’re building for, and those customers don’t all need the same thing. What they do need is an airframe that was engineered in this decade, built with modern materials, and designed to be maintained without a PhD.

    The shared platform makes that possible without reinventing everything twice.

  • The Yoke System, Explained

    The Yoke System, Explained

    From the Composite Project Kft test bench, mid-April 2026.

    You don’t usually think of a control yoke as a “feature.” It’s just supposed to work. But after watching pilots wrestle with chain-driven yokes in flight schools for two decades — slop in the linkage, asymmetric force on left vs. right yoke, chains that need lubrication every annual — Andre took it as a personal challenge.

    Linear motion. No tilting. No chain.

    The Volozen yoke moves only in one axis (fore-aft for elevator, plus rotation for ailerons). It does not tilt with elevator deflection. The drive is a Kevlar belt, not a chain. Kevlar has double the tensile strength of comparable roller chain, generates zero noise, and asks for zero maintenance over the airframe’s life.

    Anodized 7075 T6 aluminum linkage

    Carbon bridge for zero backlash

    A carbon-fiber bridge between left and right yokes makes both feel identical. There’s no slop, no elongation, no “the right yoke feels different than the left” complaint that flight instructors hear all the time. For students learning to fly, this matters. The control feel should be a constant — not something they have to compensate for.

    The torque tube goes directly to the aileron pushrod at the wing. The elevator pushrod goes to the tail. The rudder operates by pushrods too. Linear bearings, chrome-plated tubes, maintenance-free. The whole assembly is small and light enough to bolt straight into the central fuselage box without needing a separate sub-assembly stage.

    Adjustable feel during flight test

    The internal gear ratio is tunable. During flight test we’ll dial in aileron-turn rate and elevator-travel feel by feel — what’s most comfortable for owner-pilots in the touring variant, what’s most predictable for student pilots in the trainer. Same hardware, different gear ratios. Different mission, different airplane.

    It’s a control yoke. It just shouldn’t be the part of the cockpit you notice.

  • Inside the Composites Workshop — Mid-April

    Inside the Composites Workshop — Mid-April

    Build log · Mid-April 2026.

    If you visited the workshop in Ballószög right now you’d find the wing assembled, the central fuselage box out of mold, the door panels trimmed and curing for inspection, fuel-tank burst tests scheduled for Wednesday, and an electronics bench full of dimmer modules and dual-flash strobe boards being soldered together.

    The fuel tank that beat FAR Part 23

    The new 60-liter hybrid composite fuel tank is one of our favorite parts to talk about. 3.8 kilograms. 16 US gallons. Three internal baffles. No welds. No rivets. Adhesive bonded. Hydro-tested to twice the burst pressure required by FAR Part 23. We built it ourselves, by hand, after years of dealing with welded aluminum tanks that develop pinhole leaks in service from vibration. Different physics, different result. We can run two of these on the trainers and touring configuration for 200 liters, four on the cross-country tourer, six if we ever build a long-range demonstrator. Same tank, different count.

    In-house electronics modules

    Custom electronics, IP65, idiot-proof connectors

    Every wing electronics box, dimmer, fuel-valve module, and dual-flash strobe driver is going through bench test this week. Every connector is keyed differently — you literally cannot plug the wrong harness into the wrong box. That sounds like overkill until you’ve done a 100-hour inspection at 1 a.m. and realized the previous mechanic put the nav lead where the strobe lead should go. We don’t want anyone doing that to one of our airplanes.

    Anodized 7075 T6 aluminum control linkage

    Anodized 7075-T6 everywhere

    The control linkage parts went through anodizing this week. 7075-T6 aluminum, hard-anodized in matte black with a touch of bronze. Beautiful and fits perfectly. They’re sub-millimeter accurate to the carbon parts they bolt to. The whole airframe assembly stack-up tolerance: 0.01 mm.

    Engineers inspecting central box

    What’s next

    Main landing-gear drop-test machine in the next ten days. Fatigue testing the gas struts to 100,000 cycles, the gear to 20,000 landings. 32-channel data logging on every test. None of that is required for the experimental airworthiness we’re starting with. It’s required for the FAR Part 23 path we’ve committed to.

  • From CAD to Carbon: March 2026 Build Log

    From CAD to Carbon: March 2026 Build Log

    Build log · March 2026 · Composite Project Kft, Ballószög, Hungary.

    March was the month the airplane stopped being a CAD model and started being parts. Real ones — out of mold, on jigs, machined to manufacturing tolerances. Not prototype-grade. Manufacturing-grade. The kind of fit-and-finish you don’t redo when you scale up.

    The wing, in pieces and then together

    By mid-month the main spar was complete with every hole CNC-milled, every pin slot ready for the landing-gear scissors hardware. The lower wing skin came off the mold at 25 kilograms. The rear spar joined a few days later. By the end of the month the wing was assembled and zero-gapped to the position of the pins — every dimension to a millimeter.

    Wing skin progress

    Doors: gull-wing engineering underway

    We spent most of March working through the gull-wing door geometry — hinge placement, gas spring routing, lock mechanisms, clearance envelopes. The engineering challenge is real: getting a gull-wing door to open wide enough for easy entry, seal tight enough for pressurization, and lock securely at multiple points. Work continues into April.

    Door panel after first trim

    Master parts and tooling

    One of the biggest wins of March was the door-frame internal structure — one part for left and right with full rigidity, four locking points, hinge support, automatic-opening provisions, and inner-panel attachment all in a single composite layup. Without 3D printing this kind of master part used to take months. Now it takes days.

    Composite cure tent

    Jigs, jigs, jigs

    By the end of March there were jigs ready for the rudder, vertical stab, horizontal stab, elevator, and main landing gear. The aileron jigs were on deck. Two months of one engineer’s time — and after that, the actual building gets fast. Repeatable. Type-certifiable. That’s the trade we’re making with every “boring” tooling milestone we ship.

    April is going to be assembly. Watch this space.